Weekly weigh-in: ABC’s journalism fix



Well, the ABC has certainly shown its cards in the long-running debate over the quality of today’s media through its decision to increase journalism training among its reporters.

According to The Australian, the ABC believes poor journalism is the reason for the declining viewership of its flagship 7pm news bulletin and it will now send journos to writing workshops in a bid to improve the program.

A strategy document leaked to The Australian revealed improving the storytelling on the news is the key strategic approach to re-connect with disgruntled viewers.

With more than 100,000 viewers from around the nation disappearing in the last 12 months, management came to the conclusion that a recently undertaken two-hour workshop in Sydney ran by a senior journo was the answer, with this program to now be rolled out across the nation to fix the problems.

According to some media outlets, the ABC has since come out and said the plan to increase journalistic quality was not a ‘rescue plan to lift dire ratings’ and was instead a part of normal program review processes.

Nonetheless, the ABC has realised something needs to change.

History has shown that the companies and private owners of newspapers who took the need for training seriously finished up with a continuous quality of writers and photographers in the newsroom.

The ABC is taking a very sensible approach to help writers understand what their clients are listening for and therefore retaining and increasing viewers.

However, 24 hours after the original story broke, some letters to the editor of The Australian suggested a different approach should be taken by the ABC.

Kate Foot from Sydney wrote: “The blatant lack of any attempt to report political matters with balance is there for all to see and hear on a daily basis.

“My husband and I belong to the to the main demographic of ABC TV news viewers, but we no longer watch any ABC news or current affair programmes.

“The cause of the biased reporting by ABC journalists can be found in the media courses in Australian universities; clear out those institutions of the lefties poisoning the minds of their students and there may be hope for balanced story telling at some time in the future.”

Ruth Bonetti, from The Gap, Queensland wrote: “ABC management and presenters might re-read and digest the terms of the charter that requires it to speak for a range of Australians, including those outside inner-city, green-left enclaves.

“They might direct more attention to the rural battlers who feel alienated by the lack of interest in their struggles.”

Peter D. Surkitt of Sandringham, Victoria wrote: “The ABC’s problem is not that its journos do not know how to write properly – although at times I wonder – it is their insistence on substituting opinion for factual reporting. All the writing workshops in the world will not change this mindset.

“The only way ABC journalists will increase their viewer numbers is to report the news, not present their idea of how the world should be.”

Peter Curlewis of Yass, New South Wales wrote: “Not before time, ABC management has decided to shake its evening news bulletin in the wake of failing ratings.

“In part, this is to remind reporters ‘what producers are looking for’.

“Surely listeners and viewers are more important than ABC producers, but perhaps the problem is more deep seated.

“Getting back to reporting unblemished news is surely the ABC’S remit, rather than the addition of sometimes sly commentary.

“Editorialising is for the commentary pages, not the news section.”

The ABC head of news Gaven Morris told The Australian the ABC needed a stronger brand of journalism and more impactful story telling across all platforms including the 7pm news.

His seven ways of rebooting journalism are:

1) Stories with impact;

2) Knowing the audience;

3) Exclusive stories;

4) An integrated news hour;

5) Greater variety of story selection;

6) Better storytelling;

7) Reaching the regions.

Maybe a call to the letter to the editor writers would be handy.

A well-known media consultant also suggested a call to Hans Christian Andersen might be useful too.

Weekly weigh-in: Cold Cradle and energy opportunities



It’s the story behind the story of the Federal Government announcement this week to match the state’s $30 million investment for the cable-way development at Cradle Mountain.

Premier Will Hodgman promised the state’s $30 million for the project last month and Prime Minister Malcom Turnbull came to the party at a 9am press conference on Wednesday at Cradle Mountain.

Three cheers all round on what was a clear but breezy Cradle Mountain day.

However, while the smiling faces were seen in the press photos and TV shots, a couple in the group realised they had misread the chill factor and dressed inappropriately for the weather.

No one believed it was four degrees and accepted at least zero must have been a more accurate temperature.

The Premier’s shirt, tie and not so thick jumper were not handling the zero degrees temperature, especially taking into account the wind – making it closer to minus seven degrees.

He suddenly realised that his chin felt like an ice block and his mouth ceased up. He also realised he wasn’t the only icicle, when another speaker simply missed words in his speech.

When it was the Premier’s turn, he was going ok until he stopped and announced his “mouth had stopped working.”

Later that day at a Devonport Chamber of Commerce function the Prime Minister mentioned how he had previous experience with the Cradle Mountain freeze and was surprised to see the Premier in such light attire, but he knew “he’s a strong Tasmanian.”

“But I did realise he was battling, so I gave him a hug which I really wasn’t sure whether I was trying to save Will, or myself.”

Also with a cold story, was Minister for Housing and Human Services, Roger Jaensch, who stood in for the Premier at the opening of the Costa Distribution Centre at East Devonport which was held in a fridge.

And you want to be a politician…

The Prime Minister seemed very relaxed at the Devonport Chamber of Commerce full house luncheon, supporting Brett Whiteley in the Braddon by-election and reminding the community that Tasmania will not lose a cent from whatever outcome arises out of the changes to the GST formula.

He outlined the opportunities for Tasmania and the north west, which are expected to attract 60,000 additional tourists with the Cradle Mountain projects and emphasised that economic growth comes from business.

But if you are looking for passion, then look no further than the energy opportunities for Tasmania and its place within in the national energy market.

He supports the Premier’s plan to withdraw Tasmania from the national grid and therefore allow the state to make its own decisions about prices and not be regulated by the National Electricity Market.

Tasmania was already self-sufficient but still has massive opportunities in wind power and upgrading hydro.

He’s excited about the opportunities of pumped hydro in Tasmania and with the help of a second Bass Link connector, to become a major player in the national energy market.

According to the PM, all Tasmania needs is three things “courage, imagination and investment and we’ve got all three.”

It is a gigantic prospect for Tasmania and the whole suite of energy opportunities including the feasibility studies for pumped hydro projects.

The PM may be our new Electric Eric, (former Premier, Eric Reece) who increased major hydro-electric power developments which enabled Tasmania to control the most powerful hydro system in Australia and some say the world.

Weekly weigh-in: Speaker shock, Tasmanian Health Service and TasWater



The Hickey upheaval was a shock on the first day of the new Government and there will be consequences and maybe the need for a new people management approach.

But despite the shock and uncertainty of the approach taken by the new Speaker Sue Hickey, parliament continued on Wednesday with the Government passing a new health bill on Thursday.

Premier Will Hodgman and Treasurer Peter Gutwein are reminding the parliament and media that the Government still has 13 members while Labor and the Greens have a collective of 12 members between them.

This is the approach the Government has to take to ensure its policies become legislation, as expected by its majority of Tasmania’s voters in the March election.

While the Government has to continue looking forward, there certainly needs to be an internal investigation as to why a new high-profile member like Sue Hickey could be seduced to vote with Labor and Green members.

Also, how could the Hickey-Labor discussions not leak in the political sector which is renowned for leaking?

Certainly, there were some bumpy times during the election with Ms Hickey, the former Lord Mayor of Hobart, feeling a lack of respect from some in the party. Not that it was a great surprise considering the long-term disagreement with former speaker and now Attorney-General, Elise Archer.

Discussions after her successful election made it crystal clear the new Denison member was keen for a Ministry.

As expected by political analysts, this didn’t happen, but Ms Hickey gained strong support for her position as Parliamentary Secretary for Small Business – a position which had previously led to Ministries for the previous small business secretaries, Adam Brooks and Roger Jaensch.

Insiders expected Sue Hickey would follow suit and be the next Minister in two years’ time.

Whether Ms Hickey votes against the Government and her 7142 Denison voters who loyally gave her their primary vote, will only be known by the Speaker.

To avoid such a decision, the Leader of Government Business, Michael Ferguson, will no doubt be sharing and explaining legislation before it’s introduced into the House.

Certainly, the 1 May return of Parliament isn’t what the Government expected but they are quickly moving forward.

Yesterday’s legislation passed by the House of Assembly is the start of a new approach for the Tasmanian Health Service (THS) and has been supported by most in the health sector, including the Opposition.

The Tasmanian Health Service Bill will abolish the service’s governing council and the role of Chief Executive Officer David Alcorn, in his third year of a five-year contract.

The Government took the policy to the election and was quick to get the bill moving, which will smooth the management of health and includes the THS now reporting directly to the Secretary of the Department of Health.

The bill introduces a leaner executive to focus on strategic issues and state-wide service planning while making sure hospital leaders have the best possible tools to deliver front line services.

While the Opposition supported the bill, there was criticism from leader Rebecca White that the government business was debated before new members had the opportunity to make their maiden speeches which was the traditional approach.

With the Opposition spending four years creating a Government health crisis, it would have been a surprise that such a significant bill would be playing second fiddle to a maiden speech.

The Hickey Speaker shock, also took the punch out of a couple of other major stories on the first day of Parliament, particularly the new agreement with the Government and TasWater.

In a smart move, Treasurer Peter Gutwein brought the toxic takeover approach to an agreement which gives Government 10 per cent of ownership but a 50 per cent vote in decision making.

Water and sewerage prices will be capped at 3.5 per cent in June 2025 and the government will contribute $200 million over 10 years from the 2018-19 budget.

Dividends for council will remain unchanged.

The agreement will see expenditure of $1.8 billion over 10 years which is a major boost to state infrastructure.

Weekly weigh-in: Bikie laws, Bell Bay Aluminium and Motor Neurone Disease



The Tasmanian Police have a very good reason for supporting and pushing for even more legislation than originally announced by the Liberals during the recent election.

The police don’t want Tasmania to be a safe haven for outlaw motorcycle gangs.

“These laws won’t affect law-abiding motorcyclists or motorcycling groups,” Assistant Commissioner Glenn Frame said at yesterday’s press conference.

“Outlaw motorcycle gangs are significant players in controlling the importation and distribution of drugs in Tasmania.

“Their business model involves serious violence and drug-trafficking and they are constantly trying to expand their numbers in Tasmania to increase their drug trafficking network.”

Assistant Commissioner Frame also indicated that outlaw motorcycle gang members were likely responsible for unsolved murders in Tasmania.

Many in the force who deal with bikie crimes and the hundreds of drug users who are now the sad clients of the bikies, believe the bikie gangs are the most dangerous criminals in the state.

They are smart, they are clever and they rule drug users lives before the users realise what is happening.

Gang members of the Bandidos, Rebels, Outlaws, Devils Henchmen and Black Uhlans have now reached about 260 state-wide and are growing.

The Australian Lawyers Alliance, Tasmanian President Fabiano Cangelosi disagrees saying proposed legislation to prohibit association between motorcycle club members is absolutely unnecessary and very, very concerning.

“That kind of thing is uncalled for, it is a fundamental violation of people’s rights and it shouldn’t be tolerated here,” Mr Cangelosi said.

“The experience of other states is that where the power is given to police, the police tend abuse that power.”

I’m not sure families living in fear and trying to manage their children’s drug problem would agree with the Lawyers Alliance.

I was fortunate to attend two significant and diverse events this week.

The first was the farewell of Ray Mostogl, the highly successful General Manager of Bell Bay Aluminium for 11 years during challenging times.

With the support of his team, the aluminium plant worked together to pull the business out of potential closure costing 500 direct jobs and hundreds of contractors which would have been a disaster for the North in particular and the state as a whole.

The restructure of the business happened in many ways but Ray’s inquisitive nature led to a major part of the restructure.

Meeting with the night production shift in the early morning, Ray realised that the car park was half empty compared to the day shift.

The night shift was producing as much aluminium as the day shift, but why were there so many more numbers on the day shift?

So, production workers aside, Ray asked what were the roles of the other staff members, and could they be more efficient, or necessary?

The result was a more efficient business, significant money savings and improved production.

And for anyone who understands Ray, it was no surprise the he put his position in the review along with all the others.

His respect was also recognised by attendees Treasurer Peter Gutwein, Minister for Agriculture Sarah Courtney, Legislative Council Member Rosemary Armitage, Opposition Leader Bec White, Deputy Opposition Leader Michelle O’Byrne and Federal Bass MHR Ross Hart.

The second function was a fund raiser for Motor Neurone Disease Tasmania, with a packed house and superb speakers including leading Australian horse trainer David Hayes and 19-year-old Georgie Baker, daughter of Catherine Baker who was diagnosed with MND.

Not only was the event a fundraiser hosted by Jackson Volkswagen, it also allowed developer Errol Stewart to introduce his new chef and team for the soon to open Grain restaurant as a major part of the Silo Hotel development.

You could hear a pin drop during Georgi’s interview and how her and her younger siblings’ lives have changed so dramatically since their mother’s diagnosis two years ago.

There were no warning signs before she was diagnosed except some weakness in her arms,” Georgi said.

“It’s my job to take care of my two younger sisters, driving them where they need to go.”

Catherine, daughter of Graham and Ann Page, is an ex-Launceston nurse, now living in Melbourne with her family.

A wonderful, friendly and generous group but a reality check for all.

Weekly weigh-in: Banks scandal, increased penalties and costly recycling



Today’s resignation, before some would say he was going to be sacked, of AMP Chief Executive Craig Meller, will probably be the first of many senior executive ‘resignations’ coming out of the top four banks and other financial organisations.

Meller’s departure follows this week’s bombshell at the financial services Royal Commission which revealed that AMP mislead the Australian Securities and Investment Commission 20 times.

It also comes off the back of a poisoned independent investigation commissioned by AMP last year on a “fee for no service” scandal which cheated tens of thousands of clients who paid fees but received nothing in return.

It was a similar story with the Commonwealth Bank, where it became obvious that clients were paying for fees but receiving nothing in return. A bank executive actually agreed that they would be a gold medallist if ASIC was handing out a medal for “fee for no service”.

The commission has also heard that the Commonwealth Bank has been charging dead clients fees for advice, with five planners admitting to knowingly charging the dead.

It’s so hard to accept that that our foundation financiers Westpac (who started in 1817 as the Bank of New South Wales), ANZ (1837), Commonwealth Bank (1912), NAB (1982, formerly National Bank, 1858 and Commercial Bank of Sydney, 1834) and AMP (formed in 1849 as the Australian Mutual Provident Society) could find themselves in such a grubby position.

It is no co-incidence that the Federal Government has imposed new and increased penalties for serious misconduct under criminal and civil law, including slamming major banks and financial services companies and individuals.

ASIC will be granted great powers to investigate and prosecute dishonest and criminal behaviour in the financial services industry. Bank executives and questionable advisers will be targeted with penal sentences.

Criminal convictions are a maximum 10 years in prison and a fine of $945,000. Corporations could be fined up to $9.45 million, or 10 percent of their turnover under the new reforms.

Maximum civil infringement penalties are a fine of $1.05m for individuals and $210m for corporations.

It’s a sad day that as a nation, we have to increase criminal penalties to keep our iconic financial corporations from systematic cheating and deception.

How have our boards and executives allowed the creation of such a toxic culture to poison the backbone of our economy?

It was no surprise, but disappointing to hear and read that ratepayers will pay the increased costs of processing recyclable waste as result of China banning Australian waste exports.

The full impact from China is still uncertain but other states have been advised of the ban which is expected to spread into Tasmania.

According to the Local Government Association of Tasmania the risk is that some Tasmanian councils would take the cheaper landfill path despite the councils being committed to recycling or sustainable waste management.

The result means that only a few councils are in a position to absorb the increase so the majority would need to increase rates or cut services which history suggests is highly unlikely.

So here we go again, the ratepayers who are already under the pump to pay their rates and charges bills will be hit again.

Government won’t be forcing amalgamations but ratepayers can’t believe that Tasmania can afford 29 councils.

A hike on garbage costs might be the straw that recycles some councils.

Weekly weigh-in: Our growing cities and understanding pressure



The last thing we need is more government federal inquiries on anything that moves, and state projects such as Tasmania Together, which spent millions with little return.

However, the House of Representative Select Committee inquiry into the Australian Government’s role in the development of cities certainly opens up opportunities for smaller cities such as ours.

The government is starting to question that if the nation’s population is doubled by 2075 then how in heaven will they manage this growth.

Yesterday’s inquiry hearing in Tasmania was seeking answers and ideas. The TCCI presentation by CEO Michael Bailey and Chair Susan Parr, concentrated on what could help Tasmania maximise the benefit of the massive population.

Two of the five points really stood out. The first was to support the movement of government workers to regions, through the relocation of government departments from cities such as Melbourne and Sydney which are already struggling with population issues. To date, forcing public servants to move from the city to the regions has failed, with the latest example in Armidale and then the several efforts to move people from Hobart to other parts of Tasmania.

The TCCI presentation to the inquiry by Michael Bailey said it could be a physical move or virtual one.

“For example, why not allow government call centre workers to work from home if they live in regional Tasmania? We have NBN connectivity and there are plenty of workers that would prefer the livability of Tasmania compared to the choking mainland inner cities,” Mr Bailey said.

The second point, which will no doubt attract the ire of local unions, is to provide different economic settings such as pay rates and penalties for regions, rather than have pay rates and penalties based on Melbourne and Sydney workers.

“How is the national wage case, based on the needs of workers in inner city Melbourne and Sydney, fair for a business in St Helens or Queenstown?  Why not return to the regional models that reflect the economic reality and supports local business?” Mr Bailey said.

“Why not trial different economic setting in Tasmania to support the movement of mainland business to our state? This could include different pay rates, penalty rates, hours of work and so on.”

Round one is not far away!

So, you think you’re under pressure because your footy team has yet to win a game or you get wet running to work this week, or even worse, you’ve broken a fingernail.  While there are genuine pressures which sadly can become very serious, many are manufactured by the individuals that we hear from daily.

But understanding real pressure was highlighted in a brilliant piece by Fairfax’s Managing Editor Mark Baker in The Examiner on Monday.

The story was based on the rebuild of culture for the Australian cricket team and Tasmania’s Tim Paine and his phoenix like resurrection as the ideal leader for the country. He also referred to the discussion about the bubble and pressure of international cricket.

As an avid soccer supporter and player, Mark commented in his article about the famous soccer quote around pressure “It is not a matter of life and death – it’s more important than that.”

His dig deep approach into the 1940’s and 1950’s discovered “the greatest captain Australian cricket never had – Keith Miller.”  Miller was an outstanding all-rounder, a star in Bradman’s great Ashes teams, a top player for St Kilda in the VFL and could have been an Olympic Games medalist if he had time.

It will come as no great surprise then that Miller earned a Distinguished Flying Cross in the Second World War as an RAF Fighter Pilot in the famous Spitfire fighter aircraft which took on the German Messerschmitt in truly life and death dog fights.  Miller had more near misses in the air than on the cricket pitch, was on the edge of dishonourable discharge for getting sloshed and unaccepted behaviour, and again in trouble when he broke away from a flying formation because he wanted to have a look over Bonn, the birthplace of Beethoven.

Which moves onto Mark Baker’s reminder of the greatest of Miller’s quotes when asked about the pressure of cricket “I’ll tell you what pressure is. Pressure is a Messerschmitt up your arse. Playing cricket is not.”


Weekly weigh-in: Tasmanian AFL team, rising costs and electricity



While the fight for a Tasmanian team in the AFL continues to bubble along, it’s interesting to look back at the survey conducted in 2008 by EMRS on behalf of the Tasmanian AFL bid.

The bid for a Tasmanian team to be included in the national competition was reignited by then Premier Paul Lennon after the AFL announced the league was expanding to include two more teams which were likely to be Gold Coast and Greater Western Sydney.

Lennon pulled a strong team together and the bid was taken to AFL House but it became obvious that the deal had already been signed and Tasmania had no chance against Gold Coast and Greater Western Sydney.

So furious were Tasmanian Senators that a Senate Inquiry was launched in 2008 but AFL CEO Andrew Demetriou and Chairman Michael Fitzpatrick declined to attend which sums up the AFL’s contempt of Tasmania.

The bid team were very impressed with the survey results but many others thought the findings were very negative, while a few found the results to be a total mystery.

The first question revealed that 48 per cent of Tasmanians supported a Tasmanian team in the AFL, while 42 per cent said no and 11 per cent were unsure.

With the noise created by supporters you would have expected 75 to 85 per cent to be in support.

The second question was a total knockout, revealing 23 per cent would consider becoming a member of the Tasmanian team while 69 per cent said they wouldn’t.

Four per cent were unsure and another four per cent answered “it depends”.

The third question revealed 23 per cent would consider signing up for membership but 69 per cent wouldn’t. Surely another knockout to the success of the bid.

Question four is a doozy, with 40 per cent suggesting they would attend games in Tasmania but 51 per cent stating they would not attend.

The fifth and final question discovered that 15 per cent would follow the team interstate and 75 per cent would not travel.

The regional breakdown of the findings unsurprisingly revealed that Hobartians gave the highest support for a Tasmanian team in the AFL (55 per cent) presumably based on the rumour that all games would be held in Hobart.

Yet a breakdown of the membership question showed that of everyone who indicated they would become a member, 25 per cent were from the north west, 24 per cent from the north and 22 per cent from the south of the state.

The home game attendance result was also spooky, with 45 per cent of north west respondents indicating they would attend Tasmanian games, yet the figure in the south was only 40 per cent and in the north only 39 per cent.

A former politician’s summary was that Hobart wanted a team but wouldn’t support it; the north wouldn’t support it unless it’s played in Launceston and the north west will support football and sport wherever it’s played.

I think it’s about time somebody opened the cheque book and engaged EMRS to ask the same questions today.

The increasing price of houses around the nation is hard to come to grips with but it’s not the only sector where $100 notes don’t go very far any more.

Petrol bowsers, supermarkets, bottle shops, tobacconists, clothing and shoe stores, the list goes on.

At least car prices have dropped dramatically as well as airline tickets on low cost flights.

But an example of how values have sky rocketed is tomorrow’s Doncaster Handicap race at Randwick which is worth $3 million.

When Tasmanian horse Piping Lane won the 1972 Melbourne Cup the race was worth $103,000.

Owner Ray Trinder of Devonport collected more than $70,000 which was life changing at that time.

Tomorrow’s $3 million is a long way behind the $6 million prizemoney offered at the Melbourne Cup and the $13 million at The Everest sprint in Sydney.

However, the reality of opulence has landed with model Jennifer Hawkins who will no doubt be wearing the most beautiful and expensive outfit and of course, the popular fascinator.

Oh, I forget to mention the fascinator looks stunning and so it should, it’s worth $3 million.

In today’s TCCI CEO Update, Michael Bailey tries to clear up a potentially confusing issue for Tasmanian businesses at the moment, electricity prices.

Mr Bailey points out that while reports about electricity seem to be all over the media, many of these stories are written by interstate journalists and reflect what’s happening on mainland Australia – not here in Tasmania.

“In the lead-up to the recent State Election, the Minister for Energy promised that by 2022 Tasmania would have the lowest regulated power prices in Australia.  The Government’s Energy Strategy also talks about restoring Tasmania’s energy advantage, and energy as a key economic driver for Tasmania,” Mr Bailey writes.

“A key part of delivering those outcomes falls to TasNetworks, the Government owned business that owns and operates the state’s electricity grid.”

TasNetworks submitted a five year plan to the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) in January 2018.

“If the AER accepts TasNetworks’ proposal, it will mean that for most business customers, network charges will return to 2009-10 levels and then increase at a rate only slightly above CPI,” Mr Bailey writes.

To read Michael Bailey’s TCCI CEO’s Update What’s really happening with electricity prices click here.

Weekly weigh-in: Legislative Council



Senior Legislative Council member Ivan Dean has opened a can of worms among some of his colleagues by reminding them that they cannot see themselves as the de facto government.

He has taken issue with his colleague Ruth Forrest who sought to assert that there is no-anti Liberal, therefore no anti-government voting bloc, in Tasmania’s Upper House.

As Mr Dean said in his op-ed piece in today’s Mercury; “It is quite clear there is. In fact, the ‘Left wing’ forms a majority of eight in the 15-member chamber.”

“I don’t disagree with Ms Forrest on the historical background of the council or its function as house of review in our bicameral system,” he wrote.

“What I argue is that it is no longer a true house of review.”

As political followers will have picked up during the Liberal Party’s government since 2014, four so called independent members, including Ms Forrest as well as Mike Gaffney, Kerry Finch, and Rob Valentine have blocked anything remotely controversial.

Examples provided by Mr Dean include forestry, mandatory penalties, education age changes, anti-discrimination, water and sewerage legislation (TasWater), which were all campaigned for by the Liberal Government and all defeated.

Mr Dean went on to write; “Ms Forrest argued that there had been no social licence for some of these measures and that’s why they were thrown out. The Liberal Party enjoyed 51.2 per cent public support and Labor 27.3 percent. If you have gained the support of the majority of Tasmanians, more than 50 percent, doesn’t that equate to a social licence?”

With this month’s election showing Tasmania voted 50.26 per cent Liberal 32.63 per cent Labor, it will be interesting to see how the house of review operates in this new term of Government.

TCCI CEO Michael Bailey said it would be very disappointing if the Legislative Council blocked Government policies when the new Government clearly has a mandate for a series of economically beneficial policies, including the takeover of TasWater and retaining poker machines in pubs and clubs.

“The voters supported the Liberal Party’s policy on poker machines rather than Labor’s policy of restricting poker machines to the state’s two casinos in Hobart and Launceston,” Mr Bailey said.

“Clearly these two policies were high on the agenda and were out there for the voters to make their decision which supported the Liberal Party.

“It will be interesting to see if the Legislative Council listens to the people of Tasmania – I and thousands of Tasmanians will be very disappointed if they vote against such policies.

“I believe that a suggested Labor bloc would be against the intentions of this important house – it is a house of review, not the Senate.”

See more of this story on page one and two of this month’s Tasmanian Business Reporter or by clicking here.

Weekly weigh-in: Football, politics and health


Well he came, he saw but was a long way short of conquering in the context of Wednesday’s flying visit to Hobart by CEO of the AFL, Gill McLachlan.

I have no doubt that he now understands that he faces history as being the man who overlooked the closure of football in Tasmania.

Saved it can be but crikey, the oxygen tanks are near empty.

You can’t have a Tasmanian AFL team without some Tasmanian players and that’s the 10 to 15 year problem to upgrade juniors and teenagers while trying to boost the failed State League competition. Failed in that it is running out of clubs, players and supporters.

The team to create the ideas and reignite Tasmanian football are genuinely Tasmanian supporters with three living in Melbourne and full on with with their media work, coaching The Carlton AFL club, an AFL specialist and the Tasmanian CEO is hardly the right team to understand the problems. The team needs to be in Tasmania for the long term talking with clubs, players, coaches, boards, schools both state and independent, government, councils and the broader community to dig out the problems.

It was encouraging to hear Tasmanian Senator, Steve Martin, have a massive blow at the AFL and its leader, Gil McLachlan, in his maiden speech on Wednesday night.

A very gutsy, but politically smart approach for a newcomer to take festering boil to the Nation.

Criticising McLachlan for dragging his heels for months and taking too long to help bleeding of a footy crisis can’t be argued. Nor can his comment that state football in Tasmania is a disgrace. The Senator lives in Devonport and the proud footy club had to withdraw from the league this year because of funds and playing numbers, you can understand the frustration and embarrassment that as the Mayor of the City, his club fell apart because the lack of AFL assistance.

Senator Martin also put his support to help clean up the mess: “Football played a critical role in making players more employable, socially connected and motivated to succeed. I am prepared to use all moral and political weight of my office to work on the issue. “

Well done Senator.

Fascinating to see the war of words between chiefs of staff to the Premier, Will Hodgman and Opposition leader Bec White.

The Premier’s right hand man, Brad Stansfield, threw the first hand grenade in Saturday’s Mercury, with a savage assessment of Labor’s election campaign. He highlighted the gamble of spending election money in October and November when everyone knew the election would be called for the second week in March.

He also made clear that it was Labor who made the decisions to invite the poker-machine industry into the election campaign “not us.” He added: “Labor now claims they are sticking with their pokies policy. Only a fool would say there aren’t a few hard-heads in Labor who know this policy was a giant cock-up.”

The Opposition’s minder, Michael Stedman, returned fire in yesterday’s Mercury and dug deep into his journalistic background claiming that while it is true that marketing themselves is what the Liberal’s do best ,“however, what we saw over the past four years – and what has already emerged since the March 3 (sic) victory – is what makes a good campaign does not necessarily make a good government.”

On the pokies he said there was no doubt the Liberals benefited from the millions of dollars spent by the poker machine lobby.

“That does not change the fact that the Labor’s poker machines decisions was the right one, morally and ethically.

Independent polling printed in this newspaper showed 57.1 per cent of Tasmanians support removing poker machines from pubs and clubs.”

Of course a lot more punches were thrown and landed and points won from both sides.

However, the referee in this case is the only poll than really counts – the March 3 election day. Tasmanian voters clearly decided they would give the Liberal Party another four years in Government.

Disappointing to see the Launceston General Hospital emergency medicine training hitting a hurdle but the problem can be fixed by a professional recruitment team.

What is equally disappointing is that media has decided that the training accreditation has been stripped, withdrawn, lost and suspended.

The official word from the Australian College for Emergency Medicine made it clear that the decisions was to suspend accreditation. The word suspend means temporarily prevented from continuing, not stripped, or lost, or disqualified.

Let’s hope it’s a short suspension.

Weekly weigh-in: Journalism disclosure, election coverage and sledging



A $15,000 payment by the Federal Government to the most senior political reporter of the Australian Financial Review has certainly opened a hot discussion questioning potential conflicts of interest.

The journalist, Laura Tingle, was paid $15,000 by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet for two days engagement at the ASEAN business summit to be held next week.

Tingle’s role is to host a Women in Business breakfast and round table discussion.

There is nothing noteworthy about the role if you’re on the speaking circuit, but a journalist being paid by a Government department will raise questions.

Added to the questioning is Tingle’s appointment to chief political correspondent at the ABC’s 7.30 which will certainly raise eye brows at the ABC.

The ABC claims to have strong editorial policies on outside work and conflicts of interest which could undermine the professional integrity and independence of the broadcaster and lead to a loss of community support.

While many would argue that the ABC’s policy is failing, all media should check their editorial policies on independence and integrity.

The fact it’s Government paying the journalist in this case isn’t the issue. A similar engagement and payment could be from big business, an organisation, or individuals and have been approved by management.

The tricky part is when a journalist later finds themselves writing a glowing story about the organisation.

Yes, it’s a genuine story but it can get smelly if the journalist doesn’t disclose the funding received from the Government or business.

Travel writers probably provide the best example of disclosure, recognising in the last paragraph of the story the airline, hotel group or tourism operator who invited the writers and covered their costs.

It can be managed but it can also get out of control.

Coincidence, but the Tingle story also opens up another independence and integrity question – the performance of the Tasmanian media during the state election.

The 2018 election was the first for many young journalists across all media, and hopefully they learned a lot over the last five weeks.

Understanding the need for balanced, unbiased stories was a challenge for some, which was obvious in negative stories, the failure to ask questions of the party in issues they supported and aggressive lines of questioning for issues they opposed.

Probably the main complaint I heard from readers and viewers was about the presence of commentary within a basic news story.

The result is a distorted story leaning to the opinion of the journalist and not the facts.

The accepted approach of news journalism is to write for your audience, your readers, but not for your personal opinions.

When the sledger is sledged and believes the sledging is over the line and he decides he has to punch the daylights out of the sledger, no wonder the cricket world is in a fight.

The heavyweight sledging championship of Australian vice- captain, David Warner vs South African wicketkeeper, Quinton de Koch, has certainly overshadowed the result of the first Test.

Yes, Australia won by the way.

Warner, a renowned sledger which is not part of his $5m earnings, spat it when a heavily sledged de Koch moved up from the four letter F word attacks to a level that Warner claimed was “vile and disgusting”.

If not for the intervention of Tasmanian, Tim Paine, the Australian wicketkeeper, Warner would have been punching de Koch which could have KO’d his cricket future.

A $13,500 match fee and three demerit points, which is one point short of suspension, was dished out to Warner.

The demerit points carry over for two years which means one more charge and he’s definitely declared out for some time. De Koch copped a $16,000 fine.

We didn’t hear the TV voice but the picture looked like one of those CCTC images outside a club, or pub and not like one of a team of world test cricketers.

So, will the International Cricket Council ban sledging which is part of the DNA of cricket, or develop a dictionary of what you can and can’t say?

Best of luck either way!

Weekly weigh-in: Betting agency bungle and Federal Government energy

Image result for online betting william hill


It’s not unusual to see businesses and companies wiping millions of dollars from their books through bad management, tight financial times such as depressions and recessions, a great financial crisis or simply finding itself redundant in a changing world.

But it’s hard to recall a loss as bad as a bookmaking agency paying $700 million (some say $800 million) for three betting agencies in Australia five years ago, and today selling the business for about $250 million.

The sale comes in the middle of a major explosion of racing and sporting turnover in Australia.

So how did British betting agency, William Hill, manage to turn a $700 million business into a $250 million business?

It wasn’t through a “dirty run” where punters hammer the bookies and not all survive.

The simple answer comes from Michael Sullivan, the former owner of Sportingbet, the biggest of the three betting agencies bought by William Hill.

“In a nutshell, English arrogance,” said Mr Sullivan, who is now owner of a national corporate betting agency, BlueBet, which is licenced in NSW and also fields on the Sydney metropolitan racetracks as part of the licence.

Sportingbet management spent time in the UK negotiating the $700m takeover and sharing information on the opportunities and approaches in Australia.

The William Hill approach seemed to be along the lines of; it’s ok boys, we’ve been in this business since 1930 we know what we are doing. An interesting approach seeing as they were still writing crayon tickets for the punters back then.

The two major errors they made were dropping the well-known Sportingbet name (the other agencies were Centrebet and TomWaterhouse.com) and using their own name, William Hill.

Also, discouraging the bigger $1000 to $10,000 punters and replacing them with $100 punters infuriated hundreds of clients.

The punters were also offered different prices online, so if you were on a winning streak you were offered a shorter price than less successful bettor.

But the name and brand were the killer, and appointing Tom Waterhouse as CEO wasn’t well received.

So out of touch was the William Hill brand, that focus groups thought the William Hill name was a variety of smokes!

Let the bungle serve as a reminder for businesses about the importance of brand, which creates loyal customers and loyal employees.

So, the bookie’s loss is $450 million at least. This has to be one of the biggest losing bets in the world.

The Federal Government’s $6 billion takeover of the Snowy Hydro company suggests that Tasmania will benefit from the takeover as part of a parallel energy project, also set to be funded by the Feds.

The Government signed the deal yesterday which means the Federal Government now has 100 per cent ownership, having bought out the shares of NSW ($4.1 billion) and Victoria ($2.1 billion).

The agreement is that the funds must be spent on infrastructure projects including roads and rail.

The Federal Government now has an open door to proceed with its Snowy 2.0 pumped hydro project which is set to generate more reliable energy, cheaper electricity and 5500 infrastructure jobs in NSW and Victoria.

The Government has also confirmed that Tasmanian project to be the ‘battery of the nation’ will be developed in parallel with the Snowy Mountain Hydro scheme.

The Federal government is working closely with Hydro Tasmania on the pumped hydro project and the second interconnector across the Bass Strait from Tasmania to Victoria.

While the Snowy Scheme will assist in meeting Australia’s growing power needs, the Tasmanian power input into the national grid is paramount, particularly to shore up the Victorian and South Australian energy base problems.

The future is bright, as long as the State Government ensures that Tasmanian energy prices, both business and domestic, are the lowest in the country.

The opportunity to attract more business to Tasmania is a no brainer.

Weekly weigh-in: Launceston Cup and Chinese trademark squatters



Spectators, participants and politicians have been left scratching their heads after Tasracing’s decision to change Wednesday’s Launceston Cup time.

The ten-race programme is now set to kick off with the first race at 1.17pm, compared to an 11.45am start last year, with Tasracing shifting the major race to 6.14pm from its former start time of 4.14pm.

The news came from The Examiner on Wednesday, explaining that Tasracing made the decision in an effort to maximise exposure on the Sky Channel Network, thereby increasing betting turnover and ensuring big dollar returns for the industry.

What could possibly go wrong?

Well for a start, the 12,000 to 14,000 people attending were stunned to read about the significant change just seven days before the race.

Others baffled by the news included Tasmanian politicians, who had planned the original race times as the last opportunity for TV election coverage before Saturday’s poll day.

It’s believed Premier Hodgman will probably not make the 6.14pm cup race now due to a commitment in Hobart, which further highlights the stupidity of not thinking the decision through.

Traditionally, the Governor of Tasmania presents the trophy to the winner of the cup at the Governor’s Luncheon, a convention that will have to go by the wayside due to a lack of forethinking.

The doyen of Tasmanian racing, The Examiner’s Greg Mansfield, posted the story on his Facebook page resulting in a social media outcry.

In fact, I believe the response was 99 per cent negative.

Like many major cups, including the Melbourne Cup, the crowds start moving after the cup for a variety of reasons including transport and family commitments after a long day.

Concerns over the late commute back to Hobart and the North West as well as excessive drinking due to the already locked in opening times of the club headlined the social media outcry.

There were also complaints surrounding the reality that many people would leave before the major race began, that the later times caused problems for families with young children, and that no coverage of the cup race could be aired on Tasmanian TV news bulletins.

Perhaps earlier notice from Tasracing would have minimised some of the disappointment.

After all, it is one of the greatest events on the social calendar in the state and not just a money grab.

An export company trying to break into China has been stung by a Chinese trademark squatter, costing the company thousands of dollars and serving as a warning to all Australian exporters.

The horrible experience resulted from a decision to exhibit at a trade Show in Hong Kong. The company manufactures a range of cosmetics using ingredients from aboriginal people in the Kimberley.

The company followed-up on the significant number of enquiries received at the trade show and then identified a suitable business they wanted to appoint as a distribution outlet for certain regions of China.

When the time came for the product registration in China, the trademark had already been registered by someone else who turned out to be trade mark squatter asking for  $25,000 to release the rights to the product in China.

There was no option but to pay.

You can read TCCI TradeStart Adviser Sally Chandler’s full story about the trademark robbery, originally published in the Tasmanian Business Reporter, here.

Weekly weigh-in: Roadblock, pokies and celibacy



Extreme weather like we saw on Wednesday morning, burst water mains, and roadworks can certainly clog up traffic, as Hobart is experiencing at the moment.

The Mercury’s front page revealed how the RACT will call for a tripartite approach to “tackle Hobart’s traffic chaos” after motorists experienced the city’s “worst congestion in years this week”.

And of course, there’s a ‘he said, she said’ in political policies which I’m definitely not going to delve too deeply into.

Fortunately, the story did include the common-sense paragraphs from Garry Bailey, Chairman of the Road Safety Advisory Council and former Mercury Editor.

Garry said infrastructure was only part of the problem.

“These are not accidents – they are avoidable if common sense, patience and courtesy prevail,” he said.

“Drivers intent on shaving seconds off their travel time by exceeding the 50km limit, switching lanes, blocking intersections, travelling too close to the vehicle in front and in some cases running red lights, are causing delays.”

Spot on Garry Bailey. Throwing tens of millions of dollars into infrastructure will help, but it won’t change the horizon until irresponsible drivers wake up to the fact that they are the problem.

Graham Richardson, senior minister in the Hawke and Keating governments and a regular visitor to Tasmania, has put his tuppence into the Tasmanian pokies debate in today’s Australian.

He goes into detail of pokies addiction, including his father’s gambling problem, but concedes there is the need for responsibility.

“Nonetheless, despite all that I have written above, I don’t believe that Labor and White are correct on this issue, even if I fully understand where they are coming from,” Mr Richardson said.

“For me, it comes down to personal responsibility and I have considerable experience in gambling addiction.

“Many people get a lot of enjoyment out of having the occasional flutter on the pokies and that is a right that should not be taken from them because some gamblers have a problem.

“We should never welcome government intervention into how we work, rest, or play. Good intentions are one thing, the right of free will is another.”

Yes, sex sells, as newspaper and media have realised for decades, maybe even centuries.

However, it’s not much fun when our Prime Minister, Malcom Turnbull, has to tell his deputy (Barnaby Joyce) that his affair with a former staffer was appalling and a shocking error of judgment.

The result; the Prime Minister declares an immediate ban on sex between ministers and staffers.

Embarrassing that adults have to be told where they can and can’t have a sexual relationship with other adults.

As author Henri Bergson said back in the 1930’s, “Sex appeal is the keynote of our whole civilisation.”

Certainly, living in Canberra 20 years ago, it became very obvious that there were relationships at several levels of parliament, including the politicians’ fraternity.

Maybe it’s time for a far broader sex ban which covers everyone who works at Parliament House.

Yes, for all politicians, staffers and the 5000 people who work in Parliament House on sitting days.

Celibacy for all at the Nation’s Parliament House. That will fix the problem!

Weekly weigh-in: AFL’s neglect, Airbnb and exports to India

North Hobart oval


I haven’t been a great supporter of the push for a Tasmanian football team in the AFL, mainly because of the massive yearly costs, but AFL management should be ashamed of its failure to support Tasmania’s state league competition.

It’s now a state league without north west teams, and a brother to the Australian Football League, which doesn’t include Tasmania.

When asked about Burnie’s exit following the departure of Devonport from the league, AFL CEO Gillon McLachlan responded that all was well in Tasmanian football, because you can always look at the issue through different lenses.

You would wonder what he had for breakfast.

Tasmanian football has gone backwards since the AFL has taken over, and that’s at all levels including independent and state schools’ rosters.

Through the AFL’s so called wise decisions, we lost North Hobart, the third longest running team in Australian history.

We have also lost the Hobart club, the Tigers, Sandy Bay (which the AFL may not have been the assassin), City South (the Launceston club, but again not the AFL’s doing) and South Launceston who were cut down by the Prospect Hawks, who themselves lasted only a couple of years.

Now, the proud Devonport and Burnie clubs have also withdrawn from this year’s state league.

Devonport ran out of funds, the $80,000 from AFL isn’t enough, and Burnie ran out of players.

How AFL Tasmania could allow this is a disgrace, unless I’m looking through different lenses than Mr McLachlan.

New AFL Tasmania Chief Executive, Trish Squires and Tasmanian State League General Manager, Carl Saunders have been left with an awful mess and with little finance to correct the ship.

AFL Tasmania runs on about $2.5 million a year, with $1 million shared between the former nine teams compared to the AFL’s 2017 funding of $45 million to the two Queensland teams plus further millions to other leagues and projects.

How can you have any confidence in the AFL and its leader, whose approach to Tasmania is one of arrogance to force Tasmania to accept North Melbourne as our future Tasmanian team.

While Airbnb hosts are counting their cash, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is doing the same as it prepares to provide a huge shock to Airbnb players.

The time bomb is the potential capital gains tax for people leasing out their houses, or part of their house such as rooms, or entire floors.

The cost explosion happens when you sell your house or apartment and the ATO slaps the capital gains tax on the portion of the house that was used for Airbnb, or leased.

One of the growing avenues for individuals, is using Airbnb to rent out their homes while they head off for holiday seasons.

Other homeowners simply lease out spare rooms.

Already Airbnb hosts have, without warning, found themselves in debt to the ATO.

For years accountants have been warning home owners who set up their home office that there is a tax deduction, but there is also an unpleasant capital gains hit when you sell your home.

Anyone playing in the Airbnb market or leasing part of a house should organise an appointment with their accountant sooner rather than later.

For exporters wanting to crack the very fragmented Indian market, I recommend reading Sally Chandler’s column in the February edition of the TBR.

Sally, the TCCI’s Trade Start Adviser, spent much of her working life in China, India and surrounds working face-to-face with potential buyers and government officials.

You can read Sally’s Page 8 column here.

Weekly weigh-in: ‘Cabinetgate’, unfair dismissal and wage increases



I have spent a few quid with quite an extraordinary business in Canberra which sold used office furniture such as chairs, desks, filing cabinets – you name it, it was there.

While reasonably cheap, the attraction was the quality of the out-dated material from the Federal Public Service and Federal Government offices.

The best buys were the “outdated” pieces still in the original plastic coverings which had obviously been forgotten and lived untouched in storage somewhere.

But hand on the Bible, the filing cabinets were terrific but empty, so was the desk and there was nothing stuck under the chairs.

The volume was unlimited and I can just imagine the pained public servants who had to clean out hundreds of filing cabinets, desks and shelves.

However, how 10 years of Cabinet secrets were not cleaned out of the files before going to the second-hand man and eventually being obtained by the ABC is beyond belief.

If I did find a file of gold, would I have passed the information on to my Canberra Times editors, Michael Stevens and Jack Waterford?


It certainly would have been a front-page story that we had found the files, but the confidential cabinet secrets contained in these files would have been passed back to the Prime Minister’s office.

I was staggered to read that in a nine-month period last year, there were 10,480 Unfair Dismissal Applications lodged with the Fair Work Commission, which averages out to be around 1,165 applications per month, or 292 per week.

Regardless of what employers think of the application, the process can be intimidating, time consuming and stressful.

Equally, the terminated employee has responsibilities to lodge the application within 21 days of dismissal, it must be covered by the national workplace relations system, and it must have completed the minimum employment period of one year for small business or six months for other businesses and must not have reached the high-income threshold of $142,000 for the 2017-18 financial year.

As TCCI Senior Workplace Relations Consultant Abbey George said, there have certainly been some valid unfair dismissal claims.

“But experience also shows that sometimes the reasons behind an employee lodging an unfair dismissal claim is not necessarily that they thought the dismissal was unfair, but that they are now without employment and have bills to pay,” Ms George said.

For further details, read Abbey George’s column on termination advice from the February edition of the Tasmanian Business Reporter here.

Tax cuts, not wage increases, are the answer to creating employment and balancing wages for low to middle wage earners.

Based on an Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) claim to the Fair Work Commission, phased-in wage increases totalling $194 a week would be required to meet a 60 per cent of median wage target for low to middle wage earners by 2020.

The Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry has estimated the substantial costs to small businesses would be billions of dollars annually, with this figure supported by workplace experts.

According to The Australian, workplace legal experts agreed that the costs of meeting the ACTU living-wage goal, which would potentially flow through to 2.3 million workers, would be in the billions of dollars.

A business leader suggested this morning that someone had pinched the economic notes of the late Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam.

Weekly weigh-in: Arsonists, Australia Day and local councils



I love the summer heat but I hate the damage and potential loss of life as a result of deliberately lit fires.

Accidents do happen, and we have no control over lightning from electrical storms which can start series of fires over large areas.

But to find your house and property has been destroyed by a deliberately lit fire is heart breaking for families, who are left destitute, and in many cases, mentally scarred for life.

Equally as damaging for Tasmanian communities are the statistics which reveal that around 45 per cent of all fires in Tasmania are deliberately lit.

Yes, 45 per cent are the work of arsonists.

A big tick goes to the Tasmanian Police, who shared a press conference with the Premier, Will Hodgman earlier this month and announced they would be knocking on the door of known and suspected arsonists ahead of Tasmania’s high fire danger season.

Deputy Commissioner Glenn Frame said ”We won’t take a heavy hand but we’ll let them know we’re about and that we’re patrolling. We’re keeping a bit of an eye on them and hopefully that will deter them from getting out and about and doing the wrong thing.”

Great approach.

For those enjoying Australia Day, just a reminder that you are part of an overwhelming percentage of Australians celebrating January 26.

The independent Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) poll showed 70 per cent of Australians supported Australia Day on January 26, and only 11 per cent believe it should be moved from January 26.

Only 23 per cent of Australians thought councils should stop holding citizenship ceremonies on January 26.

When asked for their views on Australian history and national pride, 76 per cent believe Australia has a history to be proud of and 11 per cent disagreed.

According to The Australian newspaper, the IPA poll is in contrast to the left leaning Australian Institute, which found that 56 per cent of Australians “don’t really mind” when Australia Day is held.

Enjoy your barbeque.

The Victorian Coalition is taking a much more serious approach with unpatriotic councils, declaring they will be sacked for refusing to hold citizenship ceremonies and celebrate Australia Day.

State Opposition Leader, Matthew Guy, has promised if elected, he would amend the Local Government Act and force councils to celebrate the day and hold citizenship ceremonies.

The Opposition also suggested councils should focus on delivering core services – roads, rates and rubbish, and not national concerns.

If councillors want to change matters of national interest, they should resign from councils and run for Federal parliament.

No lamb chops tomorrow for some Victorian communities.

Weekly weigh-in: Australia Day, complaints about free money and home phone disconnection



Best of luck to any Federal Government that wants to change the date of Australia Day from January 26.

If you take Christmas Day and Good Friday out of the equation, there are 363 potential alternative dates for the day.

Normally you would think 363 options should mean there is an easy answer for a new Australia Day.

However, there are few days you wouldn’t mess with, such as the AFL Grand Final, not to mention the argument of every Saturday and Sunday during winter when the AFL and NRL take over the days and nights.

You can also forget the first Tuesday in November as an option, which is locked in by the Melbourne Cup, and probably another half a dozen major sacrosanct race days.

Then we have MOFO and major art functions around the nation which are hands off.

Of course, there are also the untouchable days of other countries and cultures, of which millions observe in our multicultural Australia.

In today’s Australian approach, somebody or group will have a bone to pick.

What we don’t want to see again is the online trolls who subjected indigenous politician, Jacinta Price, to a torrent of vile social media abuse from anti-Australian day activists over her push to keep the national day on January 26.

The Alice Springs councillor and daughter of a prominent former Northern Territory politician Bess Price, was subjected to horrific messages including wishing her a painful death and insulting her disabled nephew.

Despite the political bun fight over the failure of some Tasmanians not receiving their $125 energy bonus to assist paying Aurora bills, Westpac admitted their error in the matter and apologised for the delay.

While people were unhappy, a letter to the editor in the Mercury’s Wednesday edition provided a compelling argument.

The headline was simple, ‘Complaints about free money’.

“You know you are in the age of entitlement when people feel than can self-righteously complain about the government sending them free money a few days late.”

Evidently, Westpac was also hammered by their clients who were most unhappy that the Westpac cheques still took three working days before they were cleared in their Westpac accounts.

I’m just waiting to hear that someone’s cheque has bounced!

Just a reminder to 1194 homes and businesses in Tasmania that are about to face a “formal disconnection” of your old copper landlines, so, no phone!

Under the terms of NBN, existing phone networks are to be disconnected 18 months after the NBN is available in your area. According to the NBN, close to a million premises will be disconnected unless they sign with NBN as soon as possible.

Some Tasmanians swore they would never swap to the NBN.

One, because they didn’t want to change, and two, because the network was flawed due to its inability to operate during power outages – unless you paid for an additional costly back-up battery which still wasn’t fool proof.

We read daily of six month waiting times for connection, or weeks of people going without NBN connections for a variety of reasons. It now looks like we will have another 1194 unhappy stories in the file.

Weekly weigh-in: Petrol prices, alcohol taxes and attacks on liberty



Ask any driver on the road at this time of year who the Christmas Grinch is in their life and the unanimous answer will be—— service stations, who gouge petrol and diesel prices over Christmas.

Yes, we hear it’s the fault of the cartel of exporting nations increasing prices, but a shock discussion with a service station part owner last week confirms what we had always thought.

While paying for a full tank last week, the pleasant female attendant had just finished a phone call as I mentioned the bouncing prices of petrol around the nation.

“Well, you are lucky that you are filling up today, I’ve just had a call that Shell has upped their prices by 5c and we will now be doing the same tomorrow,” she surprisingly shared.

“So is this a result of a Singapore or some other overseas increases in price?” I asked.

“All I know is Shell have just gone up and we follow tomorrow,” the service station attendant replied.

Service stations are definitely the number one Grinch.

Continuing the shock stories, is this week’s move by Federal and State Health Ministers to significantly increase prices for beer and wines under a proposal to cut Australian alcohol consumption.

It became very personal when the targeted areas are wines, which have a lower tax level, and beer with Victoria Bitter (VB) slabs as an example.

The announcement was released last month but only became public on Monday and is a draft national alcohol strategy chaired by Federal Health Minister, Greg Hunt. It also calls for tough restrictions on alcohol advertising during sports, and laws to stop bottle shops from providing two-for-one offers and bulk-buy booze discounts.

Alcohol companies will also be asked to put readable, impactful health-related warning labels on their products.  Minister Hunt chaired last month’s ministerial forum which agreed to release the draft strategy for a final round of feedback after three years of consultation, with the aim of finalising the strategy by March 2018.

However within 24-hours of the strategies release, Mr Hunt distanced himself with a spokesman telling the Herald Sun “It’s not a Commonwealth initiative, or anything we are proposing to adopt. This would be a matter for individual jurisdictions.”

Another questionable approach by a senior politician who should be looking at education, not regulation.

So with alcohol under pressure, pokies disappearing from Tasmania’s hotels and clubs, cigarettes now $10 a drawback – if Labor wins next year’s election, what else will be on the attack list?

Another shock which the old Truth newspaper would have screamed: BRAINLESS ACADEMICS CALL FOR SEX BAN IN AUSTRALIA.

And Truth’s intro would have said: “The Academics at Melbourne’s RMIT University are calling for Australian universities to institute a blanket band on sex.” Correct to a point.

However, as the ABC story correctly said: “etc. etc. …………….calling for Australian universities to institute a blanket band on sex between faculty members and students.”

Unfortunately there’s no doubt that some unbalanced politician will suddenly advocate for the Truth approach which would be the start of the end of this planet.

I wish all a happy and holy Christmas and welcome in a fascinating 2018.

Weekly weigh-in: Scale of economies, recycling aldermen and job creation

Image result for melbourne west gate tunnel


The vulnerability of Tasmania’s economy was highlighted this week when it was announced the expansion of Melbourne’s West Gate Tunnel will now cost $6.7 billion, a blow out of $1.2 billion from the original budget.

This is just one of many infrastructure projects in Victoria, which has a population of 5.791 million, with 3.848 million living in Melbourne alone, a figure that is rising rapidly.

In comparison, Tasmania has a population of around 520,000 and a total annual expenditure of $5,819 million reported in the 2017-18 state budget.

The cost blow out of the tunnel is double Tasmania’s infrastructure spend this financial year, although the government did allocate $2 billion for the budget and the Forward Estimates.

Tasmania is geographically close to Victoria and we share so much of Melbourne’s facilities, such as the arts, international and Australian live shows and sport (AFL, cricket and racing). It’s a reminder of why the management of the state’s funds is paramount. By adopting the business type approach of not spending more than you can afford, Tasmania is now in its most viable economic position for years.

This approach means Tasmania doesn’t have $1.2 billion blow outs on projects. Instead, you create a spending environment which enables you to get back in the black while expenditure must hit the targets, which is now happening in schools, hospitals, health facilities, roads and rail, technology, tourism and assisting business opportunities. In addition, there are rebates for the community to assist with the cost of living including energy which is also extended to more than $120 million for business big and small.

Tasmania doesn’t have everything, but it’s pretty close, and you could argue that while we need more population, we don’t need Victoria’s 5,791 million.

The sacking of the 10 Glenorchy Aldermen had ratepayers cheering, after three years of war between many of the aldermen and some management including the General Manager, which left ratepayers to pick up the bill for more than $1.2 million worth of absurd legal challenges. One comment described the council as being beset by rivalry and spite.

The announcement of the new election, with voting taking place from December 19 to January 16, was a breath of fresh air for so many.

But the list of candidates has created disappointment from some ratepayers who now realise that many of the former aldermen are back in the hunt, despite a damning report of their behaviour which certainly wasn’t in the interests of ratepayers.

So how does a sacked council come to be potentially resurrected with possibly the same people from the previous council? Obviously, the result is in the hands of ratepayers who determine the winners and losers, but why allow sacked councillors a second chance?

Advice from local government experts revealed that changes to eligibility of candidates amongst other local government regulations were rejected by the Local Government Association of Tasmania.

The other argument is that while the Glenorchy aldermen were suspended for many months, most resigned their seat before the Minister for Local Government, Peter Gutwein, sacked the suspended councillors.

If there is to be change, it’s now on the shoulders of the Glenorchy ratepayers.

This week’s announcement of a $56 million state-of-the art fish feed innovation and production plant to be built at Wesley Vale by Danish company BioMar, is not just a boost for the North West, but also for job creation state-wide.  BioMar is fully owned by Danish conglomerate, Schouw and Co, which was founded in 1878 and listed on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange with a market cap of around $3.3 billion Australian.

Once the operation is up and running in September 2019, BioMar will produce up to 110,000 tonnes of high performance fish feed for Tasmanian grown salmon, as well as fish farms in other parts of Australia and New Zealand. BioMar currently delivers about $65 million of product to Tasmania from Edinburgh which cemented the decision to set up operations in Wesley Vale.

The production will create 55 full time jobs alongside a potential 80 contract positions around the state through operational, port services and logistical jobs. Construction is expected to employ 250 contractors when work is planned to start in May next year, depending on the finalisation of the development and environmental plans.

A couple of interesting statistics were shared at Monday’s press conference with Premier, Will Hodgman, Deputy Premier, Jeremy Rockliff and BioMar’s UK Managing Director, Paddy Campbell who is based in Edinburgh.

Explaining the significance of aquaculture in Tasmania, Mr Rockliff said that export income from the broader fishing industry in Tasmania was now bigger than the combined cattle and sheep income.

The second statistic came from a Government advisor while explaining the impact in the area of the 55 manufacturing jobs. The wage base for the 55 jobs is at least double the average wage of people working in the electorate.

The site is the former Specialist Veneers factory and management which closed eight years ago.

Weekly weigh-in: Cash payments, ‘free’ marketing and political correctness

Image result for australian cash payment


I’m not a dobber, but the days of paying tradespeople with cash for a significant price cut to the consumer and a tax-free transaction for the tradies, is again in the cross hairs of the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) – which is now trying to come to grips with an estimated $25 billion a year cash economy.

Tax Commissioner Chris Jordan has issued a passionate call to arms to Australians to stop paying tradespeople in cash as he confronts a host of black-economy rorts, which include the fraudulent misuse of the Bunnings ABN by service providers.

Mr Jordan said cash discounts were ripping “billions of dollars” out of the economy that should be supporting services such as schools and hospitals. In an interview with The Australian, Mr Jordan has made a direct plea to taxpayers to stop the “less for cash” mentality ingrained in the Australian psyche.

“Stop paying cash for a discount because you are effectively cheating the system or helping someone else cheat the system,” was the message from Mr Jordan.

“This is not a victimless crime. If you pay cash for a discount, in many cases you are effectively ripping off yourself as an Australian taxpayer, because this type of behaviour is what sees billions flow out of the tax system and into the cash economy.”

Hands up who hasn’t taken the cheaper approach for a house reno or landscaping job etc.? My experts assure me it’s not as relevant today as some years ago, when it was cash payment or “sorry, we can’t do the work.”

The ATO are up against a brick wall at the moment, but there are suggestions they will adopt a more aggressive stance on rorts, and will publicly name and shame offenders.

The thought process of some in this funny old world was highlighted in an e-mail yesterday titled “They walk among us.”

The story went along the lines that a guy bought a new fridge for his house. To get rid of the old fridge (still working), he put it in his front yard and hung a sign on it reading “free. You want it, you take it.”

For three days the fridge sat there without anyone looking twice.  He eventually decided that people were too mistrustful of this deal so he changed the sign to read “Fridge for sale $50.”

The next day someone stole it!

Political correctness can create the most stupid decisions, but when you run through the list of definitions you can understand why.

If somebody dislikes what you have said, you’re pretty certain to get hammered.

There’s a story a day of political incorrectness upsetting communities, be it an over reaction to a comment, or a decision refusing to allow an historic and accepted event such as Christmas to be celebrated.

When Service Tas offices around the state were told yesterday to take down Christmas decorations, I hope it wasn’t because someone who doesn’t believe in Christmas was offended by the decorations.

Whatever the reason for the decision was, political correctness has been taken to edge of the cliff.

Thankfully the Department of Premier and Cabinet introduced the common-sense approach, and now the decorations are back in the offices as they should be.

Last week, Millionaire Hot Seat compere, Eddie McGuire, found himself pilloried for some light-hearted banter with a contestant on the TV show.

“So, you have a Jewish father and a Scottish mother? I reckon it would have been hard getting pocket money from them.”

I’m not great supporter of Eddie, although we did share a very funny night in a Melbourne restaurant a couple of years ago.

Maybe this is because he’s President of the Collingwood Football Club, but regardless, was his comment worthy of the resulting uproar and media tirade?

With an Irish background, I could be claiming PC outrage daily for the number of Irish joke e-mails flooding through my laptop.

While they are pretty rough sometimes, I love them, and having caught up with relations in Dublin, they are actually often true!

I think one of a host of letters to the editor this week hit the target. “Now we are so sensitive that if you look sideways at someone, or say something slightly wrong, then you could be sacked from your job or face public ridicule by minority groups. We have lost touch with our humanity and we have lost all sense of freedom of speech.”


Weekly weigh-in: Tasmanian nepotism saga, banking Royal Commission and TV misconduct



The questions surrounding Tasmania’s nepotism sage were beautifully answered by a cartoon in Wednesday’s Mercury.

The cartoonist drew a before picture showing Tasmania attached to a strong winch based in Victoria. The after showed Tasmania connected to the rest of Australia.

The story was simple: how to solve Tasmania’s nepotism problem.

Just think how hard it is in Tasmania to employ or promote somebody you don’t know, or isn’t a close, or not so close, relation.

This is Tasmania, with a population of only 500,000 people – half of which have never been interstate, and many still waiting for their first trip to Hobart or Launceston, yet alone Devonport or Burnie.

Professional sectors such as legal, accounting, all sectors of health, and teachers are close groups. Some obviously closer than others, but they most likely know of one or the other.

Tasmanian Premier, Will Hodgman, a son and grandson of lawyers, studied his law degree through the University of Tasmania in the mid-90s and later practiced as a solicitor before an overseas stint, and eventually entering politics. There’s a fair chance he knows a few thousand people in the legal industry alone.

So, for politicians to suggest that a Supreme Court Judge was recently appointed because of his friendship with the Premier is a bit rough.

Yes, the appointee Gregory Geason, was the best man at the Hodgman wedding, as I’m sure dozens of legal friends were also part of the wedding party.

Tasmanian Bar president, Chris Gunston, was concerned by the comments of Greens Leader Cassy O’Connor, and commented that ”The most recent appointment of a judge of the Supreme Court was conducted in accordance with the Tasmanian Government’s publicly available protocol for judicial appointments.”

Mr Gunston was also scathing of Ms O’Connor for using parliamentary privilege in question time to undermine public confidence in the administration of justice and the supreme court in order to score political points.

The Premier said from the outset that he had stepped aside from the appointment interview and any process in his role as Attorney General.

Today we have a $75m Royal Commission to scrutinise the four major banks by looking at the nature and extent of misconduct, behaviour of business activity by financial services, the effectiveness of redress for consumers who suffer as the result of misconduct by an employee, and a raft of areas still to be completed for the terms of reference.

The banks have called for the Royal Commission after continued attacks on them by the Opposition and media which have been publicly hurting confidence in the financial service system. The Opposition and some National backbenchers have also called for the commission, leaving Prime Minister Turnbull with little choice but to call a commission.

The Australian Council of Trade Unions has already warned senators to be wary about the terms of reference, fearing it will become a witch hunt into industry funds and unions. This is an interesting little twist for Opposition Leader Bill Shorten, who has been demanding the commission into banks for some time.

By the way, the banking industry has warned homeowners could face higher interest rates as a result of a royal commission according to The Australian. Why? Well, the banks say share prices are resilient, but something has to give in the face of a powerful, year-long inquiry into misconduct that could cost $50 to $100 million per bank.

Please, Mr Banker, you started this process through your questionable behaviour, so don’t start kicking your clients again.

But should we stop at banks? Why not create a Royal Commission to shake the skeletons out of all the cupboards?

Obviously, we also have a problem with television stars. Daily we are hearing of alleged sexual approaches, and lewd and inappropriate language in Australia, the UK and the US. The number of Hollywood stars now named by alleged victims is staggering and is now at the stage of ‘who will it be tomorrow?’.

The terms of reference we have to include should cover questions such as why victims held back for so long; why did managers and leaders who were aware of the problems do nothing; the same for boards; and, what is being done to ensure it doesn’t happen again?

We could learn a lot from the current Royal Commission into Institutional Response to Child Sex Abuse.

Weekly weigh-in: Flight paths, cricket and investment


We want more and more flights in and out of Tasmania for interstate holidaymakers and to export fresh Tasmanian produce. Also, we want more national and overseas tourists into the state..

Obviously the planes have to land and take off which means they will need to fly over some houses in the regions or suburbs. Flight paths are created to allow the planes to land safely and not to destroy the environment of people living below the flight paths.

A decade ago, we stayed with close friends in Barnes, near Hammersmith in England for a couple of months.

At 5am the first morning I thought it was a second World War Luftwaffe airstrike but in reality they were international aircrafts preparing for landing at Heathrow Airport 20 minutes away by car.

They were so low you could see the brand of the tyres on the landing wheels (exaggeration).

Within a few days you knew the planes were still there but they didn’t wake you anymore and life was back to normal. The flight paths varied each week, sometimes no aircraft and other times limited numbers, which neighbours and friends around the area simply didn’t hear the planes.

On a much smaller scale we live under a West Tamar flight path which is probably about six minutes before landing. The Melbourne flights come directly over the house and suburbs while the Sydney and Brisbane flights come from the East and takes a tight left hand turn over our suburb.

Do you hear the planes? Not really but you are conscious of something up in the sky. Are you awoken in the night, or early morning flights? No. Even the cargo planes in the early morning are basically silent compared to the 80’s and 90’s cargo planes which previously attracted regular Letters to Editor complaining about the groaning cargos upsetting their sleep and making the dogs bark.

It’s a case of accepting change and living with the positive aspect and not the negative.

It was great to see a full house on the first day of the Ashes Test in Brisbane and even better to have a Tasmanian back in the Australian team.

While Paine is in great pain for dropping a fifty-fifty catch, the remainder of his wicket keeping was crisp and classy. We’ve been spoilt over the decades with David Boon, Ricky Pointing (captain), George Bailey, Xavier Doherty, Ben Hilfenhaus, James Faulkner, Alex Doolan and other Tasmanian players at the top end of international cricket.

I wasn’t surprised to hear that Australian vice-captain David Warner, may not play because of a pain in the neck. I thought everyone realised his problem, however it was a little embarrassing when I realised it was literally neck pain.

The ABC commentary team certainly isn’t a shadow of the past particularly with former cricketers employed on names not voices. Gerard Whatley and Jim Maxwell are certainly holding together but Tim Lane where are you?

Thank goodness for English BBC specialist, Alison Mitchell, who not only understands the game, but obviously does her homework as one of her colleagues discovered when questioning a comment. Interesting to see how the commentating team is functioning by the final Test.

Attracting interstate and overseas investors has been a high priority for governments, tourism organisations and local government for yonks. We’ve had success in recent years but support for development is a hungry giant.

One of the new investors is Singaporean billionaire, James Koh, who has opened his wallet for millions of investment into hotel developments in Hobart and Launceston.

He owns the Styles Hotel in Macquarie St, Hobart which was opened this year and waiting for further approvals, he recently bought out the development company building the Hyatt Centric Hotel, in the former Westpac building in Elizabeth St, Hobart.

The problems facing Mr Koh are the 210m and 94m hotel applications in Hobart and a sizeable hotel site on an historic block away from the CBD in Launceston is also creating grief.

Having attracted the investor, it would be foolish for both cities to kill the golden goose. The issue shouldn’t be high rise, it should be how can we work with the client who wants to spend millions of dollars?

Negotiation and creativity ideas from both parties can create brilliant results.

Weekly weigh-in: Turnbull’s slump, a premier’s wisdom and protecting the golden goose



No surprise to see the headline “Turnbull’s horror poll slump” in the Australian on Monday. Nor was the continued slide of the Coalition, which now trails Labor 45 to 55 per cent in two party terms, correlating to about 20 seats lost.

The Newspoll ‘better Prime Minister’ shows that Malcolm Turnbull has dropped from 41 to a new low of 36 per cent, and now only two per cent above Opposition Leader, Bill Shorten.

The PM’s support has now dropped from 48 per cent in July last year to today’s 36 per cent. Adding to the party’s anxiety is the ‘best Liberal leader’ poll which has Julie Bishop at 40 per cent, the PM on 27 and Peter Dutton at 11.

While the PM’s approval has dropped by 12 per cent you would expect his opponent, Bill Shorten, would be on the rise. Well yes, his rating has increased since July last year, but only from 31 per cent to 34 per cent.

So if Malcolm’s on the nose, Bill has a pretty nasty cold as well, and the nation is showing its frustration by supporting neither.

Sticking to the theme, Newspoll has listed the highest and lowest satisfaction ratings of PMs since its inception in 1985.

The top seven shockers are:

Paul Keating, 17 per cent,  August 1993; Julia Gillard, 23 per cent, September 2011; Tony Abbott, 24 per cent, February 2015; Bob Hawke, 27 per cent, December 1989; John Howard 27 per cent December 2001; Malcolm Turnbull 28 per cent, October 2016 and February 2017; Kevin Rudd, 32 per cent September 2013.

The top seven highest ratings are:

Kevin Rudd, 71 per cent, April 2008; John Howard, 67 per cent May 1996; Bob Hawke, 62 per cent, January 1987; Malcolm Turnbull 60 per cent, November 2015; Julia Gillard, 50 per cent, February 2011; Tony Abbott, 47 per cent, October 2013 and Paul Keating, 43 per cent, April, September and November 1994.

Wow, the highs and lows of politics.

When former Tasmanian Liberal Premier, Robin Gray, starts talking about his party at both state and federal levels, you know it’s worth listening. The calls I received after his ABC interview this morning suggests I’m not the only listener.

Growler, as he is known by so many of his friends and colleagues, was Tasmanian Premier from 1982-1989 during  a time of extraordinary political upheaval, including  the protests of the Gordon below Franklin dam, which became an international issue and was finally stopped by the High Court of Australia. Despite this loss, Growler was elected to a second term – the first time in 58 years that a non-Labor government had won a second term.

The basis of today’s interview was the call for senior Senator Eric Abetz to retire and Tasmanian Liberal Party Director, Sam McQuestin to stand aside to renew the campaign and strategy for the 2018 state election, probably in March.

The “yes” vote of the people for same sex marriage is an embarrassment for the parliament which avoided a vote for more than five years. Coalition pollies were not listening to their constituents including Tasmania which overall voted 63.7 per cent yes.

While there’s no suggestion that Senator Abetz should be shoved because of the same sex marriage vote, a series of questionable decisions have not sat well with the former Premier. As he said of Senator Abetz: “I believe that the party (state) has been in array for 20 years under his watch.”

Mr Gray is not suggesting sacking State Director, Sam McQuestin, who has attracted criticism for his handling of the recent Pembroke Legislative Council bi-election, but he is calling for a fresh approach for the 2018 election.

Feedback from the ABC interview strongly supported Gray’s suggestions with another twist. No matter how good the director may be, or the senior advisers, nobody really understands an election campaign except a successful candidate who has door knocked and connected to the community.

The clock is ticking for the Tasmanian election.

Weekly weigh-in: Clever CommBank, media migration mitigation and tax rate troubles

cash 2


While users of overseas call centres share stories of their frustrating interactions daily, the Commonwealth Bank has finally bitten the bullet.

Last weekend CommBank sent its message in a full-page advertisement through the Melbourne Sunday Herald Sun and a number of other interstate Sunday papers.

No photos, or graphics, just a poignant message of 20 words.

“Our customer call centres aren’t overseas, they’re over here, and you’ll be talking to CommBank people.

“That’s a welcome change.”

A beautifully crafted message which everyone understands without creating a potential racist argument.

The only reason Australian companies close down their local call centres is to save costs. Quality is way down on the priority list.

A very smart move by CommBank.

The move by CommBank also highlights the need for media to take a deep breath before blaming governments, both Federal and State, for not growing the workforce, or blaming businesses for moving operations offshore and cutting jobs in Australia.

While we hate to see it happen there are multiple reasons for the measure, including exorbitant payment agreements. Just look at the closing of the car manufacturing industry as a classic example.

But the Mac the Slasher approach of Australia media companies and the ABC in Tasmania has no bounds.

Fairfax has slashed employment numbers, particularly in regional areas including Launceston and Burnie.

Yes, advertising revenues have dropped dramatically, consequently reducing editorial and advertising numbers – probably two thirds less than the 225 of 15 years ago, including the advertising call centres which are now operating out of Manila.

The Mercury fought head office and submitted a business case showing it was cheaper to retain the current local employment and had the support of the Hobart community.

Within 12 months of The Examiner’s advertising call centre closure, the overseas call centre was costing significantly more than the once local and loyal team.

The Fairfax owned Ballarat Courier warned headquarters their classified clients wouldn’t accept the Manila centre. Within a few weeks of the change, the numbers of Ballarat clients using the call centre dropped from 75 per cent to 25 per cent.

Sometimes headquarters should listen.

Governments aren’t there to employ people but they can generate international investment and employment by ensuring company tax rates are competitive.

This is now going in the wrong direction with Australia heading to the highest company tax rate in the world. Australia’s company tax rate of 30 per cent has been out of touch since a decrease by the Howard government in 2000.

The average tax rate in advanced countries has fallen from 32 per cent in 2000 to 24 per cent. The US is currently 35 per cent with President Donald Trump planning reduction to 20 per cent, or realistically 25 per cent.

Australia’s problem is the Senate with Labor and the crossbenchers not accepting that the lower tax rate will loosen up business costs and create opportunities for expansion, ultimately meaning more jobs.

The Tasmanian Government’s 2017 budget tax incentive is such a paragon. The two schemes covered around 2500 payroll tax businesses and around about 32,000 small businesses below the payroll tax turnover.

The small business pilot program was capped at $2 million and provided a $4000 incentive payment to employ apprentices and trainees. When the cap of 500 jobs was reached last month, the government extended the program and added another $3 million to attract 750 jobs.

Five million for 1250 new apprentices and trainees is a great investment for the state and example of what could be created by a Federal government.

Weekly weigh-in: AFL neglect, bargain flights and a changing world



Good to see returned Hawthorn Chairman, Jeff Kennett continuing to support Tasmania, this time attacking the AFL over Hawthorn’s football fixture next year. And he’s spot on in accusing the AFL of treating the state as an “appendage to the competition”.

The reason for Jeff’s anger is that the Hawks will only play one Melbourne team in Launceston next season – a Saturday night game against St Kilda.

The overall fixture for Tasmanian games means only two Melbourne teams will make the trip, the other being Carlton vs. North Melbourne under lights in Hobart.

St Kilda aside, Hawthorn plays Port Adelaide, Gold Coast and Brisbane while North plays West Coast and GWS.

While the Brisbane game has some ginger with former Hawks star, Luke Hodge, tackling his former team, the stats show a dramatic drop in attendance since their halcyon days, and Gold Coast has always struggled to attract a crowd, which will be even tougher without star Gary Ablett.

As Jeff said:

“The AFL should be giving the community of Tasmania the opportunity of seeing a greater percentage of Melbourne-based teams. I’m reasonably happy with our total program, but I’m disappointed that the AFL continues to treat Tasmania as an appendage to the competition.”

Airfare bargain hunting Launceston flyers are now the smartest in Australia, following data from low cost carrier, Jetstar.

The data available honed in on the postcodes as the basis of the numbers of fares purchased under $100. Launceston, with 56,000 seats under $100 tipped Gold Coast with 51,000 and Cairns third with 32,000. The remaining top 10 in order was Melbourne, Werribee, Sydney, Mackay, Geelong, Ballina and Carrara.

Capital cities were the top destination for most of the bargain savvy suburbs with the exception of North Bondi residents who travel to Gold Coast.

The overall staggering information came from Jetstar Australia, CEO , Dean Salter, revealing that two thirds of all Jetstar fares were under $100.

The low-cost, domestic operator attracts its fair share of detractors slamming seat room, unhelpful staff, cancellations, and on-board costs, but the inarguable facts now show the arrival of Jetstar in 2003 was the birth of a generation of new aircraft passengers. The cost reduction was the magnet and overwhelms the failures.

Maybe a touch of exaggeration but if you flew out of Hobart or Launceston 30 years ago you would know 90 per cent, maybe more, of people on the plane. Today it’s closer to zero.

No wonder clients and the broader community battle with decisions by our four major banks.

Yesterday, the National Australia Bank released its massive $6.64 billion cash profit with some $5.3 billion in dividends delivered to shareholders. Oh, and now we’re going to get angry about costs and sack 6000 staff over three years says the NAB chief executive, Andrew Thorburn.

“What we’re doing is we’re simplifying the bank,” Mr Thorburn said.

“And as we simplify, we automate processes and things move to digital channels. We will need less people.”

While 6,000 front liners will be replaced by automation, NAB will hire 2,000 staff with different capabilities such as data scientists, robotics, automation, technology and AI. Basically, technology people.

I’m sure clients will be cheering now they have 6,000 less people they can actually talk to and another 2000 IT people who aren’t client facing.

NAB wants to become the best business bank in Australia. Very positive approach, but I hope somebody has been talking to existing and potential future clients.

Weekly weigh-in: Name changes, north west masters and conspiracies



Tasmania’s newest bank opens its doors next Wednesday, 1 November with an interesting name.

The B&E Building Society will now be known as the ‘Bank of us’ replacing the names of the Bass Building Society and Equitable Building Society, which has been operating for 160 years.

Respected CEO, Paul Ranson was certainly accurate when he said it would be a “different kind of bank.” The two key differences being customer-ownership, and the name, Bank of us. The marketing company is already back slapping as the name debate becomes the centre of discussion on traditional and social media.

I’m sure the 30,000 strong customer base will warm to the name as they realise customer service will continue at a high level and day-to-day transactions will remain unchanged.

Whether it becomes BOU, or Bou, is debatable and it certainly won’t be confused with other BOU’s around the world such as Bou, a town in France, the Bank of Uganda, Boulder Geomagnetic Observatory, British Ornithologists’ Union or the Basis of Union.

Names aside, it is a great asset for Tasmania to have a bank which returns profit to the state.

It’s hard not to admire the performance of so many competitors in the 16th Australian Master Games in the state’s north west this week as they break records, or simply do their best in a fun and healthy environment.

I’m sure there’s a terrific story behind every one of the 5000 plus competitors, but the star performer must surely be 90-year-old Heather Lees from NSW. Heather set a world record masters time of 24.56.97 minutes for the 90 plus, 3000m walk.

Her radio interviews were full of interesting information including her concerns about the warm weather and she certainly sounded like a much younger athlete.

A great example for all.

There are times when governments need to bite the bullet (no pun intended) and release information from significant issues and events such as the death of US President, John F. Kennedy. Like millions around the world, I can recall when and where I was when JFK was assassinated, or John Lennon, the car crash of Princess Diana and the tragic swimming death of Prime Minister, Harold Holt.

The official investigation says John Kennedy was assassinated by former US Marine Lee Harvey Oswald, who shot three bullets from a rifle as the President and his wife Jackie were riding in a presidential motorcade.

So unconvinced of the outcome of various inquiries, 60 per cent of Americans still believe a group of conspirators were responsible for the assassination.

The planned release of the last trove of secret files of the Kennedy’s murder was agreed 25 years ago.

Evidently there are some 2800 documents set to be released but after pressure from the FBI and CIA,  President Trump has reluctantly agreed to withhold 300 documents and guess what;  who wants to worry about the 2800 when the hidden 300 hold the nitty gritty.

Welcome to another 25 years of conspiracy theories.